![]() ![]() Rosen, who was acting attorney general during the Trump administration, has told the Justice Department watchdog and congressional investigators that one of his deputies tried to help former President Donald J. He has not been charged in that case.įederal agents searched Clark’s Virginia home in the summer of 2022, and video emerged of him standing in his driveway, handcuffed and wearing no pants.“WASHINGTON - Jeffrey A. But it would not open the door for Trump, if he’s elected again in 2024, or another president to issue pardons because any conviction would still happen under state law.Ĭlark was identified as one of six unnamed co-conspirators in an indictment filed by special counsel Jack Smith charging Trump with seeking to illegally overturn the results of the 2020 election and block the peaceful transfer of power to Biden. The practical effects of moving to federal court would be a jury pool that includes a broader area than just overwhelmingly Democratic Fulton County and a trial that would not be photographed or televised, as cameras are not allowed inside federal courtrooms. His decision in the Meadows case came a week and a half after the hearing. He talked about his duties as Trump’s last chief of staff and sometimes struggled to recall the details of the two months following the November 2020 election. Meadows, who is appealing Jones’ ruling, took the stand and testified for nearly four hours last month, answering questions from his own lawyer, a prosecutor and the judge. All three have indicated in court filings that they will not be present in court. Three Georgia Republicans who signed a certificate falsely certifying that Trump had won the state and they were the state’s “duly elected and qualified” electors are set to appear before Jones on Wednesday. Although the ruling against Meadows could signal an uphill battle for Clark and the others, Jones made clear he would assess each case individually. “There is no federal authority here to protect.”Ĭlark is one of five defendants seeking to move his case to federal court, and Trump has signaled that he may join them. “This case does not involve federal authority,” Wakeford said, arguing for the case to be returned to the state court. Clark also provided no explanation of what federal law he was trying to enforce or what authority or appropriate expertise he had to be looking into allegations of problems with the election, Wakeford said. That is meant to avoid people being asked to do things outside their responsibilities and to avoid conflicting requests, he said.Īnother prosecutor, Donald Wakeford, argued that Clark had presented no evidence that his actions were authorized by Trump or even that Trump had the authority to weigh in on these matters. He also described a department memo that says communications between the agency and the White House must go through the attorney general, the deputy attorney general or the associate attorney general. ![]() Under questioning by prosecutor Anna Cross, Hunt testified that the civil division had no role in investigating election interference or election fraud, saying that would fall to the civil rights division or the criminal division. Prosecutors had subpoenaed Jody Hunt, who served as head of the Justice Department civil division before Clark.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |